As mind-reading technology enters society and attempts to make excuses for the experimentation on human beings for the last 50 years, there will be many that explore this technology the way we once explored nuclear energy and the advances it will make. I applaud real scientists and techs that look at this cyborg tech as a way to combine tech with human beings in a positive way. There can be tons of advantages for human beings when it comes to understanding treating mental health, but that isn't what this project is about.
What happens when a mental patient, or a serial killer, gets ahold of this tech and uses it to create a hate crime against a minority that she not only belongs to but hates to death? That's what this blog is about.
It's like creating Jurassic Park. Remember we could remake dinosaurs but nobody stopped to think, should we? My community has an opinion that most of these mind scientists haven't considered in a practical way, which is what happens with science. It is science's job to discover new things. It's psychology's job to think about the implications. Human beings are always discovering things by giving full thought to their impact on what nature has already given us. Dinosaurs don't exist any longer for a reason, bringing them back to interact with human beings, didn't work out so well in Jurassic Park. In Palm Springs we have had our own Jurassic Park when it comes to mind control experimentation, and it didn't go well, AT ALL
Once again I applaud R. Douglas Fields, PhD for taking just a moment in "Scientific American" Magazine to wonder about the ethics of EEG mind reading and therapy, to consider if it is a good thing for privacy and other issues. Here is the article, I hope you all understand that this gives proof that the tech is here and it is being used for a long time now. March 2020, "Scientific American".
I think there is a bit of anger inside me that science has spent many years casting off test subjects for this technology as a mental disease and they are now talking about this new tech that isn't new at all. This isn't "about to enter society" for the gay community of Palm Springs or the children of the military in the 1980's, this is the past that most people affected by it don't want to see repeated. Lori LaFond and her "family" are a big black dark cloud of criminal activity that was achieved through military mind reading and criminal behavior. It was used to run a drug dealing business and to control a police department into believing that it was some kind of legal communication advancement. What is wrong with a cell phone? You don't need to read a mind to tip off the police, but if you can, you can know which police officer will break the law for an arrest. You see the difference there?
Career advancements in law enforcement were based on the discrimination of the gay community for the person, Lori LaFond, that wanted to enslave gay men, infect them with HIV, then watch them die for entertainment. This isn't an advancement, it is a set back.
I just want you all to see how science sometimes likes to ease the public into believing that some things are really great, without considering who is at the controls. In our case, mind reading, was a complete disaster in the hands of a mad woman that hated gay men.
There needs to be a legitimate discussion about this type of crime and laws need to be enforced against this criminal as an example of what can happen when someone is hiding in a dark place experimenting on human beings.