Lori LaFond may have a different perspective on reality. Her history indicates a minimal respect for authority figures. She often promises one course of action but does the exact opposite, especially when she finds herself in trouble. I recently watched a true crime story that showcased the audacity common to both Missy Erickson and Lori LaFond. The codependent nature of their violent relationships with men, whom they perceive as rivals, stems from the need to ensure the security of their illicit electronic harassment activities.
Here is the reason why Lori LaFond has to be taken off of her cell phone portability changing computer. She uses it to lure people into a crime. It is a case where someone thinks they are talking to someone they know and in reality, it is a person seeking to do them harm. This is the kind of thing that Lori LaFond did to my brother-in-law and Lori's uncle when Lori set up the killing. While I will agree that the shooting was justifiable in the circumstance that Lori set up, the death was NOT justifiable on Lori's end of this crime. From what I have been told, Lori was ordered, many years before, to stay away from members of my family. A brother-in-law is definitely a member of MY FAMILY.
Here is what happens when immature women play games with a person's cell phone. In this case, there was an affair going on, but in my sister's case, Lori made the whole thing up. She's already done this to my father on several occasions. She did it to me. Now it is time to expose Lori's uncontrollable need to involve herself in the lives of other people. The impact is always meant to be dangerous or deadly. In my brother-in-law's case, Lori wanted him dead. Period. There is no other way to explain it.
Here is the true crime story that I watched today. You can tell that phone number portability gives a violent person the opportunity to lure someone to their death. Watch:
