Most of us have heard the horror stories of hospital workers that are charged with sexual assaults of patients while the patient is in a medically induced coma. Some of these patients recall these incidents but moreover, they show the signs of sexual assault and the worker is then charged. This is a situation where a patient is in the hospital and constantly monitored. What if this situation for a human being could be caused by the person drinking or eating something that causes this kind of pseudocoma. For a rapist, this would be one of the ultimate prizes. An immobilized victim that can not move except their eyes and any involuntary muscle control that the brain does without their consent. In other words, the rape victim could still think the same, but not protect himself.
Welcome to the science behind Lori LaFond's pseudocoma rapes. This is necessary to prove that Lori is not only the rapist but what she thinks when she is in the middle of raping a victim (male, female, or minor). I would like to thank everyone that has taken this week to look at the photos from Lori's rapes. Though she thinks of them as trophies, we look at them for evidence. One less savory aspect of these photographs is that victims are subject to involuntary urination and defecation. So when showing that the victims are immobilized their eyes can be open, blinking, and moving, but they are also not able to control their bodily functions. Looking at these pictures can hold a lot of information if you know what you are looking for. This is another example of how a rape victim has to prove that he or she was not consenting to these rapes.
These rapes in Palm Springs have a factor that most rapes don't. The victim has no memory of the attack. Barbituates are the drugs used by physicians that induce comas. These are frequently called "barb comas". Unfortunately for Lori, she has learned that although a victim is immobilized temporarily, they also still have conscious thoughts while the rape is occurring. When I was raped, I was being monitored by Barbara on my team. This means that although I could not fight back, my mind was fighting the rapist who I knew was Lori LaFond. Other victims may be thinking "Jessica" or "Victoria" or some other name that the victim has heard Lori call herself, but since I've known her for such a long time, Lori simply called herself "Lori LaFond" during the rape because my mind knows her. She could have suggested she was someone else, but my mind would reject that because I know her. My rape identification of Lori LaFond, even in my conscious but paralyzed state, is critical. I identify my rapist before and during the rape, even though I am left memoryless afterward. That's when my subconscious remembers what happened.
During my rape, Barbara, as was required by Lori LaFond, has records and recordings of Lori calling herself Lori and doing all the horrible things she did to me. She has a record through my eyes and ears of my thoughts, but she also has Lori's voice through my ears. Lori is in the room and my ears are working just fine and so is my brain, so although I can't move, I can identify her just as if I was on the phone to police while it was happening.
What Lori has to say about me and herself during this period is known on EEG recordings through her own system of thought translation and audiotapes. It's probably a frightening look into the mind of a rapist in action. More than any other rapist in history we can take a look at what she is thinking and doing while the rape is occurring. Fascinating, huh? In terms of criminal prosecution, this is a scientifically proven fact. We can tell what a person is and is not responding to in hospitals already when a drug-induced coma patient is able to answer "yes" or "no" by blinking or moving a finger. What the courts don't know yet is that the patient can also think and answer without a voluntary response. It's natural and very human.
So when you see a picture like this:
I want you to know that I am in a pseudocoma or a barb coma, not able to move the rest of my body which is one reason that the photographer, Lori LaFond, doesn't show the rest of my body. Just her brother's fist and my face. It's all in the eyes for a rapist like Lori. She loves to get up close with a victim that is paralyzed and stare into their eyes. They can't give her the beat down she deserves and she knows it. So she mocks the victim by opening their eyes so they have to look at her, then her brother takes the snapshot. It's very common for a rapist to love the fear in the victim's eyes. It does something for them, but also remember, the victim is conscious when this is happening. They know everything that is going on around them. The drugs have a second effect on memory that erases most of their conscious but not their subconscious. It's all still stored in their brains.
Lori's drug-induced pseudocoma rapes give her the advantage so that the victim won't move during the implantation process or the rape. This will provide her with a victim that will be able to be humiliated in the future when they wake up. These victims are also used to spy on other members of our community without even knowing they are. In my case, my skull was severely broken, but Lori knew I was headed to the emergency room where she was able to send someone with an x-ray and a story. I never did get to see my MRI's until my father was hospitalized then I did. I knew my skull was smashed but they didn't admit me. If my brain had continued to swell inside my skull, I could have died from the pressure that was inside my head. I could have stopped breathing, had a stroke or died of an aneurysm.
I went twice. No drugs. No doctors. No help.
As Lori once wrote to me in a comment after the rape interview which is on this blog, "...the hospitals and police are there for the real victims of rape." I wonder what prompted that comment from someone pretending to be Steven Frey?
Still, I am reminded that this is a rape case and unfortunately in this world, the burden of proof is often placed on the victim of this crime. So wouldn't it be smart to know what the accused, in this case, Lori LaFond and her brother Brian, state of mind were on the morning of that rape during the time that it took place then afterward? I think it is critical in her defense to understand her state of mind so I think both sides, prosecution, and defense, are going to want to see just what Lori was thinking on the morning in question...possibly the night before?
I already had Jonathan on the inside of this organization with a man named Kevin working with him for me. Lori, allegedly, required that she be kept on this system so that she could be warned if the police caught wind of it while she was raping me. After all, the police station was less than a block away. So Lori can't have it both ways. She can't tell people to monitor her for protection and not have it monitor her for prosecution. I don't think that Lori's defense is going to want to include insanity if it can be shown that her "state of mind" was clearly on raping and infecting someone.
It's a classic case of Lori wants what she wants when she wants it, and not when she doesn't. My friends also have their memory of what Lori was like that night, where she went, and what she came home with. All evidence outside the scope of this mind reading crime. I just love it when a plan comes together. Lori never thought that her own system would prevent her from using a defense that she has in the alternative that she can't rape or kill me. Insanity is based on the state of mind and the defendant's ability to assist in their own defense. If any defense attorney has ever heard Lori they would never let her take the stand. She's a mess on and off drugs, not that the latter ever happens.
There goes the whole, "I don't know anything about Kevin since high school" bullshit that she put forth in that bogus restraining order, but it also makes me wonder how many police officers heard about me after 1986 when I graduated. I'm so sure that there are conversations about me that are recorded, like the "beekeeper" video, that Lori isn't going to look like she simply "forgot" the conversations, but that the conversations are so egregious that she doesn't want anyone to remind her how ridiculous that kind of a statement would be to her defense...even though she has already made that claim in a court of law. Of course she's known about me since high school. In truth and fact, the only things she really knew about me that she couldn't find in a yearbook signing, are from after that time. I didn't know her in school until the 7th grade. I had little contact with her after that until the 9th grade, then it was gay slur attacks but nothing else. So really everything she knows about me is since high school. Nothing else would help her make me be someone she wants to portray me as.
I was the ASB vice president, an athlete, homecoming prince, and stuff she could read about in a yearbook, but HIV, gay, and all the other things came long after I graduated. Did any of you hear this?
Remember, my father's case isn't me. He was acquitted but Lori lies about that. My brother in law was killed in 2002 and that was AFTER. My shooting in San Diego was in 2003 and that was after. The rape in Palm Springs was in 2007. Sedona was 2010. Everything she says she knows about me is all from this system. I've only seen her once since then; it was at a memorial for a friend. The other memorial, I was told she attended. I did not see her. We never spoke.
Lori's drug-induced pseudocoma rapes give her the advantage so that the victim won't move during the implantation process or the rape. This will provide her with a victim that will be able to be humiliated in the future when they wake up. These victims are also used to spy on other members of our community without even knowing they are. In my case, my skull was severely broken, but Lori knew I was headed to the emergency room where she was able to send someone with an x-ray and a story. I never did get to see my MRI's until my father was hospitalized then I did. I knew my skull was smashed but they didn't admit me. If my brain had continued to swell inside my skull, I could have died from the pressure that was inside my head. I could have stopped breathing, had a stroke or died of an aneurysm.
I went twice. No drugs. No doctors. No help.
As Lori once wrote to me in a comment after the rape interview which is on this blog, "...the hospitals and police are there for the real victims of rape." I wonder what prompted that comment from someone pretending to be Steven Frey?
Still, I am reminded that this is a rape case and unfortunately in this world, the burden of proof is often placed on the victim of this crime. So wouldn't it be smart to know what the accused, in this case, Lori LaFond and her brother Brian, state of mind were on the morning of that rape during the time that it took place then afterward? I think it is critical in her defense to understand her state of mind so I think both sides, prosecution, and defense, are going to want to see just what Lori was thinking on the morning in question...possibly the night before?
I already had Jonathan on the inside of this organization with a man named Kevin working with him for me. Lori, allegedly, required that she be kept on this system so that she could be warned if the police caught wind of it while she was raping me. After all, the police station was less than a block away. So Lori can't have it both ways. She can't tell people to monitor her for protection and not have it monitor her for prosecution. I don't think that Lori's defense is going to want to include insanity if it can be shown that her "state of mind" was clearly on raping and infecting someone.
It's a classic case of Lori wants what she wants when she wants it, and not when she doesn't. My friends also have their memory of what Lori was like that night, where she went, and what she came home with. All evidence outside the scope of this mind reading crime. I just love it when a plan comes together. Lori never thought that her own system would prevent her from using a defense that she has in the alternative that she can't rape or kill me. Insanity is based on the state of mind and the defendant's ability to assist in their own defense. If any defense attorney has ever heard Lori they would never let her take the stand. She's a mess on and off drugs, not that the latter ever happens.
There goes the whole, "I don't know anything about Kevin since high school" bullshit that she put forth in that bogus restraining order, but it also makes me wonder how many police officers heard about me after 1986 when I graduated. I'm so sure that there are conversations about me that are recorded, like the "beekeeper" video, that Lori isn't going to look like she simply "forgot" the conversations, but that the conversations are so egregious that she doesn't want anyone to remind her how ridiculous that kind of a statement would be to her defense...even though she has already made that claim in a court of law. Of course she's known about me since high school. In truth and fact, the only things she really knew about me that she couldn't find in a yearbook signing, are from after that time. I didn't know her in school until the 7th grade. I had little contact with her after that until the 9th grade, then it was gay slur attacks but nothing else. So really everything she knows about me is since high school. Nothing else would help her make me be someone she wants to portray me as.
I was the ASB vice president, an athlete, homecoming prince, and stuff she could read about in a yearbook, but HIV, gay, and all the other things came long after I graduated. Did any of you hear this?
Remember, my father's case isn't me. He was acquitted but Lori lies about that. My brother in law was killed in 2002 and that was AFTER. My shooting in San Diego was in 2003 and that was after. The rape in Palm Springs was in 2007. Sedona was 2010. Everything she says she knows about me is all from this system. I've only seen her once since then; it was at a memorial for a friend. The other memorial, I was told she attended. I did not see her. We never spoke.
