Yesterday I began the exploration of what interfacing a human's brain with a computer is like from a physiological standpoint. How can I relate to all of you how hard this is on a person. Their body is still organic and computers are not. Life is so many things, but one thing that it is not, is controlled by a computer. Life can be defined in so many ways, but the choice to link organic life with artificial intelligence is one that must be made with a lot more caution. In Palm Springs, California, we can show the entire world what it is like when the choice to link organic life with a computer is controlled by the "wrong kind of person". Lori LaFond is the wrong kind of person to make that choice for all of humanity.
First of all, Lori LaFond does not believe in God. I know what scientists would say about God and technology. Scientists are based in a world of proof. You have to prove to many of them that God exists or at least that God created man, that's not an easy task, I assure you. There are, however, ways that even the agnostic can see that certain choices by man interrupt the process of understanding life. Life, as we understand it, is about human experience, not a computer that sits on your desk and waits for a human being to turn it on. As human beings we still can not quantify what life means to every single person, so how can we allow some to make choices for us, when none of us can agree where life begins, what life entails and what parts can be enhanced by technology. In our never ending search to "make life easier", we've forgotten that we don't really know how to define it.
When the Oppenheimers taught the world how to split an atom for power, they didn't quite understand that splitting the atom would become such a powerful weapon against humanity despite the power created by doing so. The atomic bomb was initially thought of as a way around fossil fuels, a great concept, that turned into a more dangerous situation for humanity than fossil fuels created. What was once a positive innovation for humanity became the ultimate destructive device.
Sometimes technology moves so fast that we don't think. In a way, we are fortunate that Lori represents all things bad when it comes to human beings linking with technology. The human element that she brings with this combination is greed, torture, humiliation and what she calls "survival of the fittest", but is it really? I think what I have learned from Lori is the worst that humanity has to offer. To her, brain linking and brain computer interfacing is a way to steal, hurt, disease, terrify and torture people into getting what she wants. Is this the kind of person we have calling the shots? I can't imagine a less qualified human being on this planet than Lori. She is a sociopath with no feelings, no remorse, no responsibility...just "take what I want and fuck the rest." Is it wise to allow someone to have this much control over other human beings? How can equality ever be achieved with someone that creates a class of human being that controls your thoughts? It can't. She is the wrong person of all wrong people to have this kind of technology. It, in her hands, benefits her while stealing from society. This isn't an innovation, it is a terrorist act.
Let's look at Mark Zuckerberg. I like this guy and I'm not ashamed to admit it. He came up with facebook an innovative way for friends, family and others to communicate to others in a forum where other people can read, comment and suggest. Facebook is an innovation that was meant to be human, but one thing that many people, including Mark, didn't consider is that there is an element of human that isn't always helpful, loving, peaceful, kind or thoughtful. You see it in the negative comments that people post, you see it in the creation of false profiles. You see that people are jealous, envious, manipulative and, unfortunately, sometimes evil. They are destructive to others...humanity takes a hit. There is something about human beings that makes them fallible...it is what makes us human afterall...being different. That scares people as much as it inspires them.
Mark Zuckerberg learned this problem, though I am sure it existed for him long before this. He learned that his simple website can be used for some very evil purposes. When someone, for example posts, "we are having such a good time in Jamaica", someone out there is thinking, "they aren't home so I can rob their house!" Instead of friends and family getting a update, criminals are getting a plan together. There are always two sides of a coin, but I would suggest that there are three. There's heads, tails and then there is the round part between both sides and I think that's where most people live. It's not thought of, but that's where most of humanity exists. We're that round part of the coin, like on a U.S. quarter, where the ridges and lines are.
I like to think of those lines as attachments for humanity that sometimes extend to the positive side of the coin, but also extend to the negative. How many purely evil people do you know? Not that many, but they have half of the coin represented. Then again how many purely good people do you know, maybe a few. Most people live on the edge of the coin thinking that they are on the positive side. We, as humanity, are on the edge. Most of us are trying to get to the positive, let's say "head's" side of the coin, but we are forgetting that there are others that either reside on the "tail's side" or are working to get there. Prison is full of "tail's side" people or people that were moving in that direction. What Zuckerberg forgot was that as secure as he thought he needed his system to be for a "look what we're doing on vacation" site, became something else when someone decided that the information about those vacationers was far more valuable than pictures from Jamaica. There are "head's people", "tail's people" and "edge of coin" people.
I think what helps to create some of these, "leaning toward the tail's side" people, is the privacy of the home computer. People will do some of the most fucked up shit if they think nobody will find out. Lori is one of those people. Actually, I think she is "all tail" no "head"...um, no lesbian pun intended. (poor girl, doesn't know what she is missing)
Mark Zuckerberg's facebook is a wonderful thing in it's inception, but what it has become is human. Predators are more likely to strike when they can do it from the privacy of their own home. Some just plant some nasty comments to make the page owner feel bad. Others use the system negatively to stalk people while they pretend to be someone prettier or more handsome. (Side note, have you ever noticed that people that place fake ads always "pretty up"? I mean they make themselves into someone more attractive and wealthier...never do they downgrade, it would defeat their purpose, right?) I've also noticed that handsome and pretty people, use their own photos because they know what they look like...it's an odd fact that people that are considered more handsome are going to be more apt to contact you if you are too.
Rarely will you find an "attractive" person saying, "I'm into an uglier girl that is plain and doesn't do anything..." It may happen, but let's face it facebook is about validation. We want to know that people are interested and that they agree with things...only problem is this. One negative comment can make a thousand thumbs up, disappear. This is human. This is what is real. This shows you that there are three sides to a coin. Positive commenters, negative commentors and the rest of us. If you have learned the value of "saying nothing if you have nothing nice to say" congratulations, you still have a conscience. I like knowing you.
Is there anyone out there that really believes that a negative commentor isn't looking for a fight? A war of words? A Twitter war? There are instigators and peace makers...the internet has taught all of us that lesson. I won't allow any comments on this blog because I wanted to keep it organic to me. The only time that I did allow comments, Lori posted one for Ken Frank...it looked like this:
 |
| click for larger view What it seems that we are entertained by are the fights that are instigated by the negative people, Hell, even the positives are looking at them...but why? Why isn't a story of inspiration as important as Britney Spears being attacked by Demi Lovato? (Just an example, I think they are friends) The problem, I think is a misunderstanding of what people are like when they can be seen doing something and what they are like when they can't be seen. I sincerely doubt that Roseanne Barr would have made such a racist comment with Valerie Jarrett in the room. The forum allows for remoteness, but it doesn't allow for content. When people see something that was posted, they react and reacting against a comment like that is "positive" or seen that way. There is a whole new morality when you are online and when you are in person. Why is there such a divide? I believe it has to do with the distance a computer lends to negativity. I too am much more apt to "say it like it is with me" when I am online. I don't talk to Lori LaFond, ever. She screams at me and I wonder why? So let's look at the three sides of the coin when it comes to remote neural monitoring and what I've learned. Nowhere online do you see anyone talking positive about people reading other people's minds. If it is acknowledged at all, as REAL, most of the websites you see are about how this technology has infiltrated and ruined people's lives. There are those that operate this system and everyone else. There are victims of this crime and everyone else. The unknowing world doesn't know that there is a battle for supremacy between humanity and some humans that want to control it. Lori LaFond, wants to control society with this system. "If everyone thinks like I do, then I will have the most control being THE operator of this system," Lori says. This would mean that a rapist and criminal wants to control society...in my book that is the classic Bond villain; no pun intended, um, well sort of now that I see how funny that is! She's the evil Dr. No Tits or Stinky Pussy Galore or Jabber Jaws....she's the antagonist that ties up the hero and then spends three and a half days explaining to the hero how awesome she is for ruining the world. Literally, you need to hear her talk about "wouldn't it be great if people didn't think", to understand the quality of the terrorist that we are dealing with. Maturity and intelligence aside, she's a real bitch! The constant posting of negativity on to my body and mind is like the facebook section of morality inside me. I've stopped being validated by my work, my friends, my finances and my heart, to be condemned every minute of the day by a Bond villain. This villain stole the ability for me to be a positive human being...simply because she can force her negative EEG's upon me and I can't turn them off. It's the struggle between good and evil and it is fought inside my brain every minute of every day. I can sleep, but she can force herself upon me, like a rapist. "Don't take no for an answer," might be what successful business people do, but it's also what a serial rapists says to herself too. "No" is a perfectly good answer in the wrong situation, isn't it? Lori thinks that no, "No," is satisfying. It would be if she knew the outcome though...she never thinks about it beyond what she wants. If Lori can be tied to her negative activity, oh Hell let's call it criminal activity, then she would be less apt to do it. It's the remoteness of the computer that allows her to complete her crimes without ever leaving the living room. There she is "safe" or at least she thinks she is. My body is in constant conflict with her "hate Kevin-ness". I love myself and I know I am working toward ridding everyone of these unwanted and unsolicited messages of hate from Lori LaFond. Keeping that in mind, you have limitations as a human being. You can only go so long without food, water, air and other things, a computer doesn't sleep, eat or breathe and as long as Lori can use meth to keep herself like a "computer of negativity", then she will be able to hurt people simply by wearing them out. To me, that is a physical assault. A mental assault is physical, just ask any doctor. I am being bludgeoned by Lori and Christian every second of the day with artificial negativity that continues to try to take over my body. I have to work at keeping myself who I am. This kind of negativity doesn't wash off with a shower. You can't scrape it off like gum on your shoe. It takes the kind of work that I am doing now, and others, to remind people to think for yourselves. Don't allow someone like Lori, with her limited intelligence to dictate what society's morals are, you won't like her plan, I assure you. In order for people to remain organic, they have to be able to think for themselves without other people knowing. It is at the core of humanity. Our private thoughts are what spark innovation, enhance society, create art and poetry. If everyone thinks like Lori we'll all end up in a perverted sex dungeon where we have to call her Hitler...er, I mean, Mistress Lori. This has happened with ideals in the past. As Hitler rose to power he thought of creating a human race that he saw as superior. That meant that they looked a certain way, they worshiped a certain way and they did not tolerate any other ideology than his. It started slowly, and built into a World War. This is where Lori is taking us. This is a trip into her fantasy world that we can no longer afford as a gay community, a minority and as a human race. There is too much experimentation on how to be evil and not enough on how to be good. The remote quality of this crime depended on the actions of this operator. She was purely out to hurt gays and men, some women, but to make the world feel like she does. I have a question for the police and victims of this crime. Do you really feel like Lori wants you to? Do you think you feel like her? For every cop that arrested some gay man on Lori's word, did you fell, for a second, like Lori? Trust me, what Lori got out of it, was not what this cop did. Lori was sexually turned on by arresting a gay man that she or her brother had raped. Is that what these cops felt? I sincerely doubt it because they weren't the rapists. So, no Lori, I don't feel like you do. I don't know what it would feel like to rape one person, six hundred and fifty plus men later, I don't even think most rapists feel what you do. You feel nothing. What you feel is the feeling a person gets when they think they have power over someone. True goodness doesn't seek that. So, with a system that creates a caste of those "in the know", victims and people that don't know anything about this, are we really striving for equality? Not Lori. The reason is that if all things are equal, Lori becomes invisible again. There is nothing special about her. Keeping people on uneven ground gives her an edge. On the microphone or with a fake ad, she can be beautiful, friendly, sexy or something she is not in real life. She can also use this system to take that feeling of happiness from others and that makes her happy...but nobody else. This is a Hitler stance. If everyone believed like Adolf, then HIS world was happy, but everyone else suffered. The good of one or the good of all. This is what it is like with Lori heaping negativity upon me and others every minute of every day. I pray that someone takes her meth away from her and never lets her have any more ever again. She will become more human than Supreme Priestess and that is when we can take an honest look at what has been done here. |
