 |
| This will get Laurie's attention...I thought of using a "news flash" gif, but boobies work better for Laurie. |
In order to get and keep, the petitioner from the City of La Quinta's attention, I used a gif that she couldn't possibly pass up.
It has come to my attention that my first blog and this blog made mention of the fact that both Christopher and myself were both confidential informants for the PSPD. This is something that the petitioner from the City of LaQuinta had to know since she went through that blog and misrepresented everything that was said. She failed to mention or told her attorney that I am an informant and that I am working on a case for the PSPD. If that petitioner told M. Katherine Jensen Esq. that I wasn't an informant, then how in the fuck would she have known that? Why didn't this attorney look into that?
What you saw with that restraining order was an end run around the PSPD to keep this person from being eliminated as a suspect after I received credible information about her from Jonathan Mendenhall. Seeking an illegal order to keep me and my team away is a crime.
I want to be very clear to Ms. Petitioner and her brother...in the future, if you should try this again, I will make the court aware of what my team is looking in to and that I will have the judge contact the police officer that you claim to have a "four year relationship" with and we'll clear all that up before you lie again. An attorney that doesn't meet in person with her client and interferes with a police informant needs to understand the kind of danger she put both Christopher and myself in. I don't know how this woman could hear something like "he isn't a police informant" from this petitioner and still think that she has no contact with the PSPD? If she knows nothing about me then she knows NOTHING...not just what she picks and chooses. I know that Sgt. Anderson knew that she was aware of us both being informants from the second we signed up. Her lying to her attorney and to the police about me is a deliberate attempt to involve herself in my work.
The decision to go public about our informant status was due to this kind of behavior that put both Christopher and myself at risk. Going public and telling you all that this IS THE TRUTH is my way of letting that woman know that seeking legal action through perjured statements is also, now, part of that investigation.
How in the Hell can this woman claim to not know me...then say I'm not an informant? She says she knows no other police officers than Bryan Anderson, so how did she come up with this??? It is clearly bullshit.
The restraining order for the City of La Quinta cost Christopher a year and a half of his life. I do quality informant work because I am doing it for an officer that I respect and because I respect the law. The crime directly involves me and my friends and i don't like having to tip toe around where I live hoping to not run into this person of interest when I clearly have a right to look into everything in the Frey case. It would be illegal to know what I know and not say it...
Furthermore the behavior of the police officer, attorney, district attorney and Commissioner Best shows a complete break down of the legal process...which is what I've grown to expect in this investigation. Favors for Lisa...and warrants for victims. One good plus is this...none of these people can ever claim again that they don't know about the subject of "electronic harassment" in the valley.
The subsequent warrant for my arrest is an obvious result of a system rigged against anyone that speaks out about electronic harassment.
Understanding that Jonathan Mendenhall told me that Lisa is the petitioner from that restraining order...you can now see where she goes to get her agenda completed. Commissioner Best, Aileen Alvares, Deputy Fiebig and an attorney from the County of Riverside that she feels she is entitled to have because of the tattle tailing she does for the PSPD. I can assume she doesn't use the PSPD because they all know she is the person...allegedly. This should make it much easier for Sgt. Anderson to identify how she does what she does. Smart huh?
I want to remind all of you that just prior to her restraining order that the petitioner called my sister's cell phone and warned her that what I was doing with these blogs was "dangerous for my family". Why would suggesting that she might be a lesbian be "dangerous" for my family??? Did she mean that being an informant was dangerous or saying the word lesbian was? If she meant informant work was dangerous then she must have lied to her attorney and all the rest of the people she involved.
How did she get my sister's phone number in the first place?
If the petitioner ever wonders why her behavior is "suspicious" she need look no further than these actions alone.
