Morally Conscious

Broadcast live streaming video on Ustrem an IBM product

VLOG cam: I like to record messages to our viewers to watch here. If there is something pressing I want you to know, watch here and you will see the latest message recorded from me!

Today's theme:
No matter what Lori and Brian LaFond have to say, people need to understand that we are in a different age of information. The crime of making a person a computer interface-able thought stream without their permission is an eventuality that people must start to grapple with now. Interfacing a person's biological privacy to an entire community of unknown individuals violates human and civil rights laws. It goes to the heart of religious beliefs, social beliefs and sexual beliefs. The implications of ignoring this new breed of internet predator is imperative to understand. No person's biological privacy should become the subject of DARK WEB humor. This kind of criminal is new and must be dealt with in an American way that shows that we all could be victimized by this crime.
Visit "Save Our Sons" for more information about tis crime. This is a non violent informational blog about the crime of electronic harassment in Palm Springs, California. The blog, in no way, intends to promote a crime against anyone. It's intent now, as always, is to become the property of DreamWorks Entertainment as a motion picture project for them. Do not commit any crimes because of this blog.
Logo Design by

Logo Design by

Tuesday, June 13, 2017

They Must Have Thought You Were A "Flight Risk" Too...Time To Go Back In Your Cage Laurie!!!

Rumor or fact?  The difference is stunning when you consider who we are dealing with.

She talks and talks and talks like a parrot on crack, but when she wants to seem POWERFUL and DANGEROUS to people, she brags.  Why would a person in so much trouble talk to her heart's content?  It's called bravado...and talking herself into a corner.  The latest problem from Laurie, as usual, comes from her own mouth!  

When the Great State of Arizona did us all a favor by arresting the siblings, out of state and their comfort zones, they were wise enough to realize that GPS ankle monitoring was a good idea.  I've been in court many times when the judge ordered t his kind of surveillance of suspects that find a way to bail out of jail.  The screw these monitors to the bodies of suspicious defendants because they have been arrested for allegedly committing a crime that warrants it.  It means that the charges are significant and the people, questionable.  The court is required to set a bail in an amount that is equal to the offense charged and that a defendant can meet.  

So Laurie's been talking about how proud she is to have beaten the system again...but is that wise.  Let me tell you a bit about GPS ankle bracelets that are court ordered.  They aren't to be messed with.  The send signals and show movement to the people that monitor them.  When they are cut off and don't move, the monitors of these devices know that there is a problem.  No person stays stationary for that long.  Here's the other thing.  A defendant, or in this case, two defendants, with cell phones are actually carrying two GPS devices.  One that is court monitored and one that is automatically monitored by cell phone towers.   When the siblings carried their phones with them then cut of the ankle bracelets, they essentially began monitoring shows where they are.  We all know how Brian loves his "safety phone" and Laurie can't without it...drug dealers seldom lose their phones with all of their "contacts".  It makes it difficult to deal drugs.  In Laurie's case, ALL of the information about the victims and their families, is stored on her phone.  Police emails appear on one too...this is her life.

Now we have the right to find out who they have been texting, emailing and threatening with those phones that followed their ankle bracelets from Arizona to here, where, apparently, the bracelets were taken off and "hidden", still sending a signal for as long as they could, never moving.  That alerts police in Arizona as to where the defendants that jumped bail are.  There is a reward for returning these devices to their owner, the counties from which they were purchased.  If found they provide law enforcement with a valuable tool to find and re-arrest the suspects.  DNA will confirm the identities of the accused.  No fake id will ever work again.  The warrants are then ordered from the bench and the suspect will always be those people.  Now there is reason for the police to suspect the sureties too.  They have their own cell phones in the area and are also being used from the same home where Laurie and Brian's phones have been.  This is an arrest-able offense.   Bail sureties that have promised to return defendants to the courtroom that don't notify the court that they are actually living with the defendants are considered to be hiding the suspects.  In our case, they are allegedly involved in this drug dealing too.  Both present in Sedona with the defendants and both right there with their cell phones.  Aiding and abetting the defendants will get them charged too.

Tracking Brian and Laurie is as easy as tracking the sureties on the bonds that they signed.   There is no reason for any of you to fear using this system to locate and turn the suspects in to the Arizona authorities.  There isn't any kind of entrapment.  They are fugitives that gave up their rights to lots of things when they bonded out.  One of those conditions was to obey all laws, federal, state and local.  Remember that restraining order from La Quinta, California that Laurie did?  It wasn't legal and it is a violation of that agreement, no matter what name she used.  Anybody that knows where she is and knows that she was the defendant from Arizona can call and have her picked up.  They only need to tell the police what they know is true and where she is.  This is the law.  It is a requirement of the law.  When you give up your rights "pre trial" you give them up to be free.  Laurie and Brian assumed that the "names" on the pretrial release order were the ones that had to obey the law, but it is the person, not the name that does this.

There is no entrapment for these warrants that exist if you tell the truth about where these two are living and what you know that they have been doing illegally.  Additionally, if you know where these ankle bracelets are or where the pair stored them, you are obligated to give that information.  If you know that aliases were used or fake addresses for residency were given, you are required by law present that information to the court.  The court had sufficient evidence and wisdom to order the high bail amount and require sureties with ankle monitoring...that means there was a strong belief that they were a risk of "flight" or "danger" to the communities in which they reside...or both.  You all have the obligation to turn them in.  This is why they give up certain rights at the time they were freed.

Do your jobs and rid us of what has been plaguing this area for is their problem now.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.